In case it may be of use to someone else I updated GitHub example with solution both of you pointed out.
https://github.com/fejnartal/elm-utcombination Credit to: https://github.com/evancz/elm-architecture-tutorial/blob/master/nesting/1-counter-pair.elm El sábado, 6 de agosto de 2016, 19:57:16 (UTC+2), FerN escribió: > > Precisely, I was about to share that same link. > I hadn't seen that example. I may have been focusing too much in tampering > with the language and the syntax and completely forgot to read more > documentation and examples. > Thank you very much for your nice support and suggestions. > I think I'll go back to reading the official guide step by step and check > more community examples. > ;) > > El sábado, 6 de agosto de 2016, 19:47:38 (UTC+2), Peter Damoc escribió: >> >> Fernando, >> >> Have you seen the Modularity section of the guide? >> http://guide.elm-lang.org/architecture/modularity/counter_pair.html >> >> How would the counter pair be implemented with your method? >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Fernando J. Naranjo Talavera < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone. >>> I have been experimenting with Elm language for some weeks now, mainly >>> in the areas of Styling and Composition. >>> In all this time I have been struggling to find a suitable solution for >>> Composition and Separation of concerns in Elm when it comes to Medium / >>> Large projects. >>> Sadly, what I have found is that (the in all the other respects >>> *excellent*) Elm type system and architecture, always stands in my way. >>> >>> >>> I have pushed a really small Elm project to GitHub in which I have tried >>> to settle what (IMHO) would be an interesting addition to the Elm language: >>> The ability to Combine/Compose Union Types (not individual Tags) >>> >>> https://github.com/fejnartal/elm-utcombination >>> >>> This project is so tiny that, I believe, everyone should be able to take >>> a look a understand the kind of flexibility I'm trying to pursue. >>> So I would be very glad to hear your suggestions. >>> >>> - If you believe the language is already able to account for the kind of >>> abstraction I'm trying to build PLEASE, I would be very grateful to hear >>> about your approach to this problem. >>> - If you think you would end up using such a feature, that would be >>> great news. And also, any suggestions or drawbacks that you may have >>> identified in t he proposal. >>> - Whatever you have to say. Thanks. >>> >>> All my career, I have been mostly an Object Oriented programmer and it's >>> only now that I'm beginning to learn and practice with functional >>> languages. So, it's quite possible that my OO mindset may be reflected in >>> the code. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
