On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 9:07:35 AM UTC-6, Peter Damoc wrote: > > The elm-parts Msg is defined as: > > type Msg c = > Msg (c -> (Maybe c, Cmd (Msg c))) > > This is why I consider the "without parts" the pure TEA. >
True, I can see that yeah, unsure of a better way off hand either... On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 9:07:35 AM UTC-6, Peter Damoc wrote: > This is another reason to have this discussion. > Søren did the best he could with the technology he had at his disposal. > He has created something that removes some of the pain but introduces > other issues like the manual identity management that can lead to issues > like the one you describe. > > There has to be a better solution. > I keep trying different styles of things, but I can never seem to come up with one that works very well while allowing arbitrary expansion of view elements without huge amounts of highly duplicated but not-quite code that cannot be reduced due to lack of functionality in Elm as of yet. Really do need 'some' method though... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
