(Safe code being code where you don't have to remember to do things.) On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:48:09 PM UTC+1, Will White wrote: > > You have to remember to qualify. > > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:40:21 PM UTC+1, Janis Voigtländer wrote: >> >> In what ways are qualified imports at odds with safe code? >> >> I think the opposite is the case: unqualified imports lead to less code >> safety. >> >> Am 18.08.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Will White <[email protected]>: >> >> I prefer safe code to qualified imports. >> >> On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote: >>> >>> "Qualified imports are preferred." >>> >>> http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax#modules >>> >>> I try to avoid as much as possible importing everything from a module. >>> If I would have IDE support for automatic imports I would never do a import >>> Module exposing (..). >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
