On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 11:24:22 AM UTC-6, Richard Feldman wrote:
>
> You are on the road to #2, so my macro-level suggestion would be to go 
> back to #1. :)
>

#1 also ends up making utterly *huge* model and message unions though, with 
extremely non-reusable parts.  :-)

But yes, for a generic app #1 is best, however something like elm-mdl is a 
fantastic building of #2 that becomes almost trivial to use inside #1.  :-) 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to