> > you seem insistent that the right approach to Elm is to write relatively > monolithic pieces of code and then try to tease them apart if they become > too complex. >
Yes, exactly! Considering this is the most consistently successful approach to scaling in the entire history of software, I feel very comfortable endorsing it. ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
