On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:43:27 AM UTC-6, Joey Eremondi wrote: > > It's also worth mentioning that first class modules are a decent > replacement for type classes. >
That is precisely the main reason that I am wanting them. ^.^ Although in that case having OCaml'ish Class Interfaces[0] would simplify code even further. ^.^ [0]: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml-4.00/manual005.html#toc24 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
