I took a look at the thread and felt that it is better to say nothing. A lot of the arguments around there look somewhat like the discussions that were silenced by the move away from FRP.
Elm is trying to be simple and easy to use by people coming from JS not from Haskell. If someone wants to say something positive about Elm, they could just show off their work. "I made this with Elm" is a lot more convincing than trying to argue for or against some language feature. On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Joey Eremondi <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a "PureScript vs Elm" thread going on on the Haskell Reddit right > now: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/569cax/ > factors_going_to_elm_purescript_selection/ > > Elm's getting a lot of negative press. > > I certainly don't want to start a flamewar, but I think it would be > helpful it people went and politely talked about their positive stories and > use-cases with Elm, to provide a counterpoint to the "Elm's types aren't > fancy enough to get real work done" narrative that's going on there. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
