I've got a situation where I've got task that will always succeed, and I
want to know the best practice for using it with Task.perform.
The task itself is a Task.sequence of tasks that may individually fail, and
I want to report the result - success or failure - for each of them. So
there's no meaningful failure mode that I can find for the final
I've seen a suggestion in this group for defining a performSucceed function
this seems perfectly reasonable to me. But I'm also trying to write elm as
idiomatically as I can, so I wanted to know if this is generally considered
Similarly, if my approach (i.e. aggregating a bunch of results into a
sequence of success-failure Results) is wrong-headed, I'm happy to
entertain alternative implementations.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.