I´m a "no Elm experience people" and i dont like "match with".
to type "case of" i need 6 keystrokes(without spaces) to type "match with" i need 9 . i would prefer to remove the "of" and just leave it as "case ?!? ->" instead of "case ?!? of ->" Regards to whomever lives to type less and love more... ;) 2016-10-20 15:06 GMT+01:00 Robin Heggelund Hansen <[email protected]>: > First of, I would like to say that for me personally, this proposal > doesn't matter. > This proposal is written because I believe people with little to no Elm > experience will understand the construct better. > > The proposal, as the title of the post suggests, is to rename the > "case..of" expression to "match..with". The reason being that I believe the > words better matches what the construct does. As a non-native English > speaker, case..of doesn't immediately make sense. However, match..with > makes perfect sense. > > Match..with is what the same construct is called in F#, so it has that > going for it. > > Case..of to match..with renaming could be handled by elm-format. > > As said, to me personally and, I believe, other seasoned elm devs, this > won't matter that much. > The question therefore becomes, how big of a difference will it make to > new and future elm developers? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
