Yeah comparing underscore length seems inferior to counting back ticks.. Maybe that was the idea? to discourage the use of double/triple primes etc and steer people to a more point free style? The 0.18 migration guidance does not mention anything like that though
On Sunday, 23 October 2016 18:07:12 UTC+1, John Orford wrote: > > For the record I loved using primes for the first time in Haskell - it > gave me the feeling of doing maths again, but while programming : ) > > I agree with your '_' point. Perhaps it should also be nixed following > your line of logic... But I love my underscore and forget variables also : / > > >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
