> let-bound values can be given type annotations that reference type variables from the top level
that's v thoughtful actually, I hadn't heard that before, just local variables in any case, makes a lot of sense for tricky functions. is this an elm specific creation or do you also see it in Haskell? (iirc, never) (what I wouldn't give for let-in in Python right now...) On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 at 14:55 Max Goldstein <maxgoldste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm personally looking forward to three longstanding bugs being fixed. > First, recursive definitions like x = x are caught by the compiler. Second, > a bug caching compiled forms of modules has been resolved, forcing a > rebuild when necessary. Finally, let-bound values can be given type > annotations that reference type variables from the top level. This makes > certain code much more readable. > > 0.17 was a groundbreaking release. 0.18 is a much more polished one. It's > true that we don't have server-side rendering yet, and the debugger UI > needs a few tweaks, but this is forward progress and I'm happy for it. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
