You mean something like:

triggerReadingFromJson =
 Http.toTask (Http.get "my.json" decoder)
 |> Task.andThen (\result -> Task.succeed result)
 |> Task.onError (\error -> Task.fail error)

But in this case the result is "Task.Task Http.Error MyType". What can I do 
with it? I need somehow cast it to either MyType or Cmd, right?


On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 3:23:13 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Chained to Task.andThen and Task.onError? And what those tow must return? 
>> I assume commands as they can't change model directly, right?
>>
>
> Chained with Task.andThen ;) 
>
> As for the return type, I would return success and fail data and only at 
> the last stage map it onto the message creators. 
> The command is the equivalent of the Task in that it is a request for some 
> side effects. It is not the result of the side-effect. 
> The result of the side-effect is either some type decoded from some Json 
> that is received (in the case of usual requests to Json APIs) or some kind 
> of error type. 
>
>
> So, in the case of Http, the final Cmd is a complex request that 
> encapsulates a series of Http requests and is able to produce either a 
> success msg or a fail msg. 
> The data that end up in the messages gets there as a result of the 
> execution of said Cmd. 
> Which of the messages (success or failure) ends up in your update is also 
> predicated on the execution of the Cmd. 
>
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 2:46:41 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, old habits. 
>>>
>>> The Http API became Cmd oriented. You don't need Task.attempt. Just use 
>>> the regular Http.get and use the Cmds produced by it. 
>>>
>>> If you need chaining, there is a `toTask` function that converts 
>>> Requests to Tasks 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank. This makes lots of sense in regards of first argument.
>>>>
>>>> What about the second? In 0.17 it could be for example:
>>>>
>>>> (Http.get "my.json" decoderFunction)
>>>>
>>>> But not it produced an error:
>>>>
>>>> Function `attempt` is expecting the 2nd argument to be: Task.Task 
>>>>> Http.Error (Maybe MyType) But it is: Http.Request MyType
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 2:22:48 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The old Task.perform was creating either a success message (if it 
>>>>> succeeded) or a fail message (if it failed) 
>>>>> The current Task.perform cannot fail. It is used for Tasks that are 
>>>>> known to succeed like requesting the window size or requesting some 
>>>>> random 
>>>>> number. 
>>>>>
>>>>> The Task.attempt takes a function that takes a result (results 
>>>>> encapsulate both the success and the failure) and produces a message 
>>>>> based 
>>>>> on that result. 
>>>>>
>>>>> You could define something like: 
>>>>>
>>>>> handleRequest result =
>>>>>     case result of 
>>>>>         Ok val -> 
>>>>>             SuccessMessage val 
>>>>>         Err err -> 
>>>>>             FailMessage err 
>>>>>
>>>>> and use it like this: 
>>>>>
>>>>> someHttpCmd = Task.attempt handleRequest someHttpRequestTask 
>>>>>
>>>>> Alternatively, you could just have only one message that takes a 
>>>>> Result and handle each case in that message's part of the update as 
>>>>> demonstrated by the Http example:
>>>>> http://elm-lang.org/examples/http
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry again if something obvious but Im not sure how now to make 
>>>>>> async requests in 0.18.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In 0.17.1 it was done with Task.perform where first parameter was a 
>>>>>> success Msg, second - fail Msg and third is the task which execution 
>>>>>> result 
>>>>>> is then passed to first function.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I understand now Task.attempt must be used but 
>>>>>> documentation is not quite comprehensive. Could someone please advise?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
>>>>> blog: http://damoc.ro/
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
>>> blog: http://damoc.ro/
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Elm Discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
> blog: http://damoc.ro/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to