I mostly try to use qualified imports instead of exposing variables into my
namespace. This leads me to using the `as` keyword often, like this:
```
import Module.B as B
import Module.C as C
{- etc. -}
```
In Go, accessing a namespace through the last part of it's name, is
implicit. If that was true of Elm as well, the example above would be the
same as:
```
import Module.B
import Module.C
{- etc. -}
```
For me, having this in Elm would remove most of my uses of the `as`
keyword. If my other import proposal was also implemented, import handling
would be simpler, at least for me, without sacrificing readability.
What do people think?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
