Has anyone actually encountered anyone being confused by the names? I
haven't. I think this a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Will White <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that’s because you already know what Just means. I don’t think it’s
> arbitrary though from an accessibility point of view. Some or None is easier
> for newcomers to understand than Just or Nothing, especially as Some isn’t
> misleading the way Just is, as Andrew described well.
>
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 17:05, Joey Eremondi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Honestly, these choices seem pretty arbitrary. Everyone has a preference. ML
> uses Some/None, Haskell uses Just/Nothing. Some people find Something
> intuitive, some don't.
>
> Given that the choices is (mostly) arbitrary, it seems best to stick with
> the status quo.
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:47 AM, 'Andrew Radford' via Elm Discuss
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Probably inherited from Haskell, like a lot of other stuff. Doubt if there
>> was any other thought put into it if I'm honest.
>>
>> On Monday, 21 November 2016 14:46:40 UTC, Will White wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, meant to say “I guess he’s already considered and rejected them”.
>>>
>>> On 21 Nov 2016, at 14:21, Will White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I prefer Some or None, for understanding. Though, unless Evan didn’t know
>>> about them, I guess we’d already have them.
>>>
>>> On 20 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Robin Heggelund Hansen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How about 'Some' and 'None'?
>>> Those are not longer to type than what we have today, and they should
>>> solve your initial confusion.
>>>
>>> søndag 20. november 2016 18.16.26 UTC+1 skrev Will White følgende:
>>>>
>>>> I'm talking about Maybe.Just, of course. Just has always seemed strange
>>>> to me, as if it's hinting that it's something other than just the
>>>> counterpart to Nothing. I don't know the reasons behind its naming, but I
>>>> think I would prefer Something, as in "something or nothing". What do you
>>>> think?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/EHnuE_gGFuo/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Elm Discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/EHnuE_gGFuo/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to