“those will go from a series of No’s to a series of Yes’s” would also make sense.
> On 30 Nov 2016, at 21:42, Will White <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is what it comes down to for me: > > Richard F talking about Maybes: https://youtu.be/IcgmSRJHu_8?t=9m21s > > He says "those will go from a series of Nothings to a series of Justs". > > Thing a | Nothing would mean he'd say "those will go from a series of > Nothings to a series of Things" which makes more sense with the semantics of > Maybe and which makes more sense to the uninitiated listener. > > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 5:16:26 PM UTC, Will White wrote: > I'm talking about Maybe.Just, of course. Just has always seemed strange to > me, as if it's hinting that it's something other than just the counterpart to > Nothing. I don't know the reasons behind its naming, but I think I would > prefer Something, as in "something or nothing". What do you think? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/EHnuE_gGFuo/unsubscribe > <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/EHnuE_gGFuo/unsubscribe>. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
