You probably already suspect as much, but anyway: I think (and I’m not authoritative at that) that the following part is the crux of the matter.
Commands tie into the effects manager system but that’s at this point still an undocumented portion of Elm and I don’t see why effects managers could not also work with tasks. Do you have real reason to believe that effect managers could work with tasks? That you don’t see why not seems to be a consequence of you not seeing any information about their internals at all, right? If you were told that indeed effect managers cannot work as well with tasks (for example, that the “batching of ticks” trick mentioned in the documentation of old http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/evancz/elm-effects/2.0.1/Effects#toTask would not be possible), would that make you retract the proposal to have only Task, instead of Task and Cmd? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
