On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:16 PM, GordonBGood <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even if this method works, the interim method means I have to produce >> JavaScript code which I understood that the purpose of Elm was to avoid. >> If one still has to write large parts of the code in JavaScript for this >> particular application, one then starts to ask why not use TypeScript >> directly (c#'ish syntax) or Kotlin with the JavaScript back end (more >> concise, can be very functional in use, quite a bit more advanced stage of >> development than Elm). For me, these are the implied questions this thread >> raises. >> > elm certainly hasn't hit the "all things for all people" stage yet, but if you do want to use an elm-like language with easier js interop I'd recommend F# rather than typescript or kotlin. check out this blog post: http://lucasmreis.github.io/blog/from-elm-to-fable/ martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
