On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:41 PM, GordonBGood <[email protected]> wrote:
> That leaves me impressed with the ease-of-use for Elm, with my biggest > wish list all concerned with making Elm faster; but it is still early days > for the language as long as it is still evolving. > Elm is fast enough for most purposes and it will get faster (e.g. there is a new implementation for Array in the works that I understood to be faster) If you need a piece of code to be faster, you also have the option of designing it as a driver for the runtime and just use the Native layer to access it. This is an advanced use of Elm and a last resort, you have this freedom if this is what would push the project over the "fast enough for practical purposes" -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
