> > It was very, very nice. It allows for seemless APIs that simplified > the code sharing a whole bunch. >
Oh? My impression was that you thought this wasn't worth it, based upon comments here https://github.com/noredink/take-home#should-i-use-this-in-production and IIRC what I've read elsewhere. Incidentally, I also hate the term isomorphic for shared client-server code. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
