On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 4:14:15 PM UTC, Rupert Smith wrote: > > On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 4:10:06 PM UTC, Rupert Smith wrote: >> >> Then I could represent the data models as HAL or JSON-LD >> > > Or JSON-API, there are way too many emerging standards in this area... >
Actually, I want to try and keep the data representation in Elm and in the meta-model that codegen sources from abstract enough that it does not contain details of the specific wire format being used, or is particular to any single API description meta-language. Enough details that it can be mapped down to anything reasonable. If I manage that then I can always move to different formats as things evolve, or use Protocol Buffers to be more efficient, and so on. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
