On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 5:06:44 AM UTC-4, Oliver Searle-Barnes wrote: > > What if unsafe because a first class concept in Elm? You could mark > functions as "unsafe". Any function that calls an unsafe function would > also be required to be declared as unsafe e.g. >
I use Elm entirely because of it's reliability, and would be very unhappy to risk this for a bit of convenience. In fact, I even wish ports would go away ;) The only unreliability I've every had working with Elm was due to the unreliable JS code I was interfacing with through ports. Oh, the happy day when the entire Internet is written in Elm.... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
