Sadly this debate seems to have ended :) On Saturday, March 11, 2017 at 1:59:31 PM UTC+1, Răzvan Cosmin Rădulescu wrote: > > Interesting comparison, I need to check out this purescript some more. > Never heard of it before but it does look like there are libraries that > provide reactive functions or something, research time! Thanks :) > > On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 8:14:59 PM UTC+1, jphedley wrote: >> >> Here's a nice balanced Pros & Cons Analysis of JavaScript vs Elm vs >> PureScript vs GHCjs vs Scalajs >> <http://mutanatum.com/posts/2017-01-12-Browser-FP-Head-to-Head.html> >> Functional >> UI Platforms, which includes Higher-Order Reflex FRP >> <https://github.com/reflex-frp>. >> >> >> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 10:21:43 AM UTC-8, Răzvan Cosmin Rădulescu >> wrote: >>> >>> Well, I have to say, I didn't think the discussion will last this long >>> to be honest, I'm pleasantly surprised :). From here on I'm going to handle >>> it to you guys as you have more experience than I am have. I hope it gets >>> somewhere constructive! >>> >>> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 7:09:36 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Mark Hamburg <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What it feels like one wants to write but can't is the function: >>>>> >>>>> throttle : Float -> Sub msg -> Sub msg >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think you might be able to do this kind of thing in an Effects >>>> Manager. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >>>> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >>>> >>>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
