On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Rehno Lindeque <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This grey list would be backed by a clear process of getting things on the >> list that would include a checklist of mandatory things. >> This checklist would be like a rule list and breaking any of the rule >> would have to happen after a serious benefits analysis done under the >> supervision of that experienced Elm programmers group I mentioned earlier. >> > > If this were the route people decide to take, I get the impression that > this is the sort of thing elm-community does quite well. Perhaps a > "greylist" could be simplified to https://github.com/elm-community/*. > Of course, that would be the optimal course. I guess this would make the packages a very light shade of grey, closer to something semi-official than something apocryphal. :) -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
