Great idea! What can be done to ensure that these efforts wouldn't go in vain?
On 1 May 2017 at 10:14, Oliver Searle-Barnes <oli...@opsb.co.uk> wrote: > In https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/yHiAJ_wcG3c Max > proposes that we put together some literature reviews. If we're to > collaborate on this effort we'll need to consolidate our investigations > somewhere. Having seen the success of the RFCS repos for Ember > <https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs> and Rust > <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs> I wonder if we could use a similar > model. RFCs for those languages are in the business of proposing a concrete > API (along with supporting evidence) but the structure of a literature > review could be a template based around the questions Max posed. > > I believe this would give us an open process that the community can > contribute to collectively. It would allow newcomers to the language to get > an overview of what the community is thinking about (saving on the > countless reruns of feature discussions we have in here) while providing a > structure and focus that will provide Evan with the information that he > needs. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
