Great idea! What can be done to ensure that these efforts wouldn't go in vain?
On 1 May 2017 at 10:14, Oliver Searle-Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > In https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/yHiAJ_wcG3c Max > proposes that we put together some literature reviews. If we're to > collaborate on this effort we'll need to consolidate our investigations > somewhere. Having seen the success of the RFCS repos for Ember > <https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs> and Rust > <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs> I wonder if we could use a similar > model. RFCs for those languages are in the business of proposing a concrete > API (along with supporting evidence) but the structure of a literature > review could be a template based around the questions Max posed. > > I believe this would give us an open process that the community can > contribute to collectively. It would allow newcomers to the language to get > an overview of what the community is thinking about (saving on the > countless reruns of feature discussions we have in here) while providing a > structure and focus that will provide Evan with the information that he > needs. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
