Thank you for the feedback.

I am still trying to find a non-effect based API. Did not find anything
satisfying so far.

The WebSocket.LowLevel module is interesting for send batches, but my
main issue is how to associate a custom message translator to each
subscription in a global protocol state.

Le 16/05/2017 à 17:02, Aaron VonderHaar a écrit :
> Hi, I haven't played much with WebSockets, but I have been building a
> protocol on top of HTTP.  I haven't yet run into an issue that made me
> think to try an effects module.
> 
> Instead of having custom subscriptions, my package has an `update`
> function that takes any msgs resulting from its commands and returns
> some appropriate stuff (in my case, that is an optional output value
> that the caller can do something with, and also another Cmd to run).
> 
> For the Cmds, I do have to use the Tasks portion of the HTTP API so that
> I can compose and chain things together (though I do in the end return a
> Cmd for most functions in my protocol's API).  For WebSockets, I see
> there's 
> http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-lang/websocket/1.0.2/WebSocket-LowLevel
> which provides Tasks instead of Cmds, so it's likely you could use that
> for what you need.
> 
> I don't know if those things will address all the needs of your
> WebSockets protocol, but those approaches have worked for what I've been
> building.  (Sorry, it's not open-source, so can't share the code.)
> 
> --Aaron V.
> 
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Christophe de Vienne
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi everyone,
> 
>     I am attempting to implement the pub/sub NATS (https://nats.io) protocol
>     on top of the WebSocket API as a TEA component.
> 
>     I have a hard time finding an API for subscriptions: for each
>     subscription some context must be kept, a unique subscription ID
>     generated and in some case a unique reply subject too, and I would like
>     each subscription to generate custom messages for the component which
>     made it.
> 
>     I suspect it would be a lot more natural with an effect module, with
>     which I could (hopefully) write, in any part of the application:
> 
>     subscriptions : Model -> Sub Msg
>     subscriptions model =
>         Nats.Subscribe model.endpoint "some.subject" MyMessage
> 
>     or, for req/rep (a pub + a short-living sub expecting a result):
> 
>     myrequest : Model -> Cmd Msg
>     myrequest model =
>         Nats.request model.endpoint "a.request.subject" MyReply
> 
> 
>     Another difficulty I have is that in some cases I need to send 2 or 3
>     messages through the websocket, in the right order, but WebSocket.send
>     returns a Cmd. So I have to concat the 3 commands in 1 message, which
>     works but oblige
> 
>     Am I wrong being tempted by using an effect module for this kind of
>     module ?
>     If so how can I mimick such an API with a TEA approach  ?
>     If not is there any documentation I can read to get familiar with them ?
> 
>     Is there any existing module that does this kind of thing for another
>     protocol ?
> 
>     Thanks!
> 
>     --
>     Christophe de Vienne
> 
>     --
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>     Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
>     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>     send an email to [email protected]
>     <mailto:elm-discuss%[email protected]>.
>     For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
>     <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Christophe de Vienne

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to