On Monday, August 28, 2017 at 4:01:20 AM UTC+3, Mark Hamburg wrote:
> One other note: If you don't care about Reactor and the Debugger but do 
> care about async problems, you could get almost the same structure by 
> passing back Model -> Model functions instead of Model values.

Sorry Mark, this sounds cool, but Iā€™m kind of a slow thinker (generally) ā€” 
could you give some pseudo-code to show an example of what you mean? šŸ˜Š

> Doing so may cause you to receive a visit from the Elm thought police but 
> it is entirely semantically viable within Elm (and it's what I could 
> imagine a lot of other functional languages doing by default).
> Mark

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to