Hi Mitch

Were you able to create writeup? 

I am about to start using Elm with WebRTC.


On Monday, 8 August 2016 19:21:37 UTC+5:30, Berry Groenendijk wrote:
> Hi Mitch,
> I am very much interested in your writeup. I am writing a prototype for an 
> app. I am just building the front-end, the UI in Elm. No back-end. And I 
> thought... wouldn't it be nice to share the in-memory data between browsers 
> that have the app open. So, I looked at WebRTC. But, then I found Orbit-db (
> https://github.com/haadcode/orbit-db). A distributed peer-to-peer 
> database build on top of IPFS. It is still very beta software. I got some 
> basic functionality working using ports. Unfortunately, the database does 
> not seem to sync between clients... But, I like the idea. Building Elm apps 
> with storage in a distributed cloud.
> So, I am looking forward to your writeup!
> Berry
> Op maandag 8 augustus 2016 14:51:44 UTC+2 schreef White Jack:
>> Hi Mitch,
>> thanks a lot for sharing. Have you created port of some existing JS 
>> library or created ELM implementation from scratch?
>> On Sunday, 15 March 2015 18:15:08 UTC-4, Mitch Spradlin wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> I'm fairly new to Elm and as a part of the learning process I wrote an 
>>> Elm application that uses WebRTC to connect peers to each other to create a 
>>> distributed network that allows users to chat with each other. After 
>>> showing it to some people, they encouraged me to create a writeup about how 
>>> WebRTC and Elm can interoperate. However, not having written much about 
>>> software other than documentation, I would appreciate any thoughts on what 
>>> subtopics would be interesting to discuss and which ones are not as 
>>> interesting to cover.
>>> The writeup probably wouldn't be super long and would focus on the 
>>> current state of using WebRTC in and Elm application. After a broad-strokes 
>>> summary of WebRTC and how it can be brought together with Elm using ports, 
>>> I would explore some possible patterns that come from using ports to have 
>>> the kind of one-way effects characteristic of this use case. I would then 
>>> talk about difficulties that are encountered in this setup and finish with 
>>> how promises (soon to be renamed commands?) will likely change things such 
>>> that writing the Elm side of things in this context will be much easier.
>>> Again, I appreciate any thoughts y'all might have!
>>> Thank you,
>>> Mitch

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to