that's v true - perhaps programmers are are too prone to idealism... but
then again, it's a perk of the job ; )

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 at 12:14 Peter Damoc <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reality is prickly-goo and gooey-prickles
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4vHnM8WPvU>.
>
> Elm sins by seeing reality too much from a prickly point of view.
> You can call this opinionated but if it is taken to an extreme, you get
> the symptoms typical to a prickly system, the main one being the stifling
> of creativity.
> Creative people are gooey and they don't thrive in an environment that is
> too prickly.
>
> Also, businesses need gooey stuff because they deal with reality not with
> some abstract world of ideas.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:19 PM, John Orford <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think Elm is a very opinionated language - which lends itself to love &
>> hate : ) Which is a good thing - languages in which you can do anything and
>> everything are guey slimey things...
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 at 18:36 Charles Scalfani <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Back in the day when Java was all the rage, I used to ask 2 interview
>>> questions of developers:
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. What do you love about Java?
>>>    2. What do you hate about Java?
>>>
>>> I never cared what the answer was to #1. It turns out that they simply
>>> listed all of the things that people who promoted Java mentioned,
>>> write-once-run-anywhere, etc.
>>>
>>> It was #2 that I was really interested in. Many developers couldn't
>>> think of a single thing. That told me that they didn't know Java. At the
>>> time, I could've talked for an hour about all the things that were wrong
>>> with Java (and still are). Why? Because I really knew the language. And
>>> familiarity breeds contempt.
>>>
>>> This article feels like the answer to #1 by someone who really doesn't
>>> know the language yet or at least hasn't built anything real or large with
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong I love Elm but it's not perfect (no language is).
>>>
>>> I'd hope that your articles include the good, bad and the ugly. By doing
>>> so, you will help more people understand if Elm is right for them in a
>>> balanced way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 11:02:11 AM UTC-7,
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm a developer and founder of an agency specialised in digital product
>>>> development.
>>>>
>>>> This summer we've decided to do some experimentation with Elm and we'll
>>>> be summarising the findings in a series of two blogposts.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the first one. Comments are welcome.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.imaginarycloud.com/blog/elm-javascript-reinvented-1-overview/
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>   TF
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Elm Discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Elm Discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
> blog: http://damoc.ro/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to