> Georg Bauhaus <[email protected]> writes: > > > I wonder if this case of adding another argument to a profile > > is far less of a problem at Eurocontrol, that is, if indentation > > is only momentarily not working? > > That's a good point; how intelligent does the indentation need to be in > the case of invalid code? > > If it gets control structures right, but everything else is either > "indent at same level" or "indent at next level", would that be > sufficient? Yes I think that is good. Or said otherwise, the interactive edition of the ada-mode 4.1 is reasonable enough for such cases. So, having ada-mode 5 behaving (more or less) similarly for these cases is a good starting point (i.e. not seen as a major regression).
Philippe ____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL, unless it is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender. _______________________________________________ Emacs-ada-mode mailing list [email protected] http://host114.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/emacs-ada-mode_stephe-leake.org
