Of course, we have the similar problem that if we make an entry set with add-hook in .emacs untouchable, then the user can not undo it for the current session any more either, even though this is feasible and safe right now.
That is a good point. It is harmless to change any value just for the current session--the problems arise when you try to save the change. That creates a problem for solutions based on changing the way the user edits the value. However, they may not be insuperable. One idea is to offer the user a choice of two representations to edit: the "safe" one that allows saving the result, and the "raw" one that allows setting but not saving. Referring to something set in .emacs as "Set for the current" session would be very confusing because things set in .emacs outside and inside the `custom-set-variables' form are set in the same session. I agree. Perhaps "set by .emacs" should be distinguished as a state. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel