[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Choosing a new numbering scheme has been discussed for years now, > without making any decisions on what to do. > > So for the moment, I simply decided to use 22.0.50 for the CVS version > as this is in accordance with the current numbering scheme, and all > the relevant code assumes this convention. > > Adapting to whatever new scheme you decide to use will be trivial. But would probably require a dedicated version comparision algorithm to be implemented, which is a complete waste of time. Almost everyone agreed with using 22.0 because it is obviously simple and sane. Why trying to make things more complicated through a non-democratic decision? Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
