David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nobody expected it. It was a special situation that arose.
I don't think that is a good excuse to ignore CVS and make an ad-hoc release that is not labelled, nor as far as I can see not even checked in to CVS. > The way Richard has described it, I don't think that we can at all > rule out that a similar situation might happen again. Which is why it is even more of a concern that this release was so ad-hoc. There is a danger now that if it happens again, we will lose the movemail patches. > The solution would seem to have one branch where critical fixes are > applied to regardless of whether a release is anticipated. EMACS_21_1_RC was supposed to be such a branch. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
