In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree that signaling an error is better than xassert. >> But, it seems that a function in selection-converter-alist >> can return a multibyte string as long as we have a fixed >> rule about how to handle it. And "converting to a unibyte >> string by string-make-unibyte" seems to be a good rule. > String-make-unibyte might not do the right thing. It's just a guess when we > don't have any alternative. In this case we have an alternative which is to > signal an error. > After all, this did catch an error in the handling of encode-coding-string > with compound-text, so I think it's better to signal the error than to > silently try to correct it. I reconsidered this problem, and now I agree with you. I was at first negative on signaling an error in lisp_data_to_selection_data because I was not sure it is safe to do that. But, I found that Fsignal is already use in this function. So, I've just installed these changes. 2005-02-14 Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * coding.c (encode_coding_string): Always return a unibyte string. If NOCOPY is nonzero and there's no need of encoding, make STR unibyte directly. * xselect.c (lisp_data_to_selection_data): If OBJ is a non-ASCII multibyte string, signal an error instead of aborting. --- Ken'ichi HANDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel