There are now several xasserts in the vertical motion routines that are supposed to check for some assumptions about progress made on display. I strongly recommend taking them out.
a) they are causing frequent aborts in normal editing operations. At a time where one has to refer people to the trunk Emacs for quite a bit of functionality that feels somewhat unfortunate. b) they don't check for _structural_ incoherence (namely that Emacs' internal data structures are not garbled), but for _visual_ incoherence. But for debugging this one needs information about what kind of things happen on the screen at the time, and just in what manner some expectations might get violated. This is much easier to get when Emacs remains operative and gets a chance to _display_ the result of the operation instead of committing suicide. After all, one can then repeat the process and narrow down just what causes it. And it significantly widens the audience that can help with debugging. It is much easier to describe what happens on the screen than to pick apart the data structures in an aborting Emacs (which are not usually accessible with most compilers and the standard compiler flags for optimization, anyway). Those xasserts that replace visual cues with an aborting Emacs do not just make using Emacs for serious work harder, but they also actively _hinder_ debugging possibly occuring display problems. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel