Jason Rumney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> That's completely backwards. > > What's completely backwards is to turn off a feature that helps us > find bugs so that people can treat the CVS HEAD as a stable release of > Emacs.
At least half of the xasserts that have been reported to fail so far have been false alarms -- or at least too harmless to cause an abort. Before Miles enabled xasserts unconditionally, emacs had IMO been running rock solid for a long, long time -- except for a few unexplainable crashes. Now we have a more unstable and slower emacs -- but none of the aborts so far have given a clue to any of the unexplainable crashes. I agree with David that the benefits from the xasserts do not justify the costs at this stage of development. IIRC, even 21.1 was released without having xasserts defined by default during pretest. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
