> C-x g is also bad, it has a already existing keybinding since a > long time. > > C-u C-u C-l, C-x C-g, C-s NN, all seem like good candidates. Can > some Emacs developer just pick one, and define it to goto-line > and kill this stupid thread?
IMHO, `C-x C-g' is a bad choice, because it is supposed to abort (C-g) an unintended `C-x'. I'd vote for `C-x g' or `C-M-g'. I oppose to C-x g strongly, as for C-x C-g, I think you are wrong there. C-x C-g produces "C-x C-g is undefined", ditto for things like "C-x v C-g". And then, you always have ESC ESC ESC to the rescue. :-) Happy hacking! _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
