Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 10 2005, Kim F. Storm wrote: > >> Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Wouldn't the "file:linenumber" feature require an absolute filename >>> unless the buffer local value `default-directory' happens to be >>> appropriate? I'd guess that such situations are rare (sender and >>> recipient often have different file locations). >> >> I always start gnus in emacs/src directory -- so I can quickly look at >> backtraces... > > I see. But do you really think that this situation is so common that > it's relevant for the _default_ binding of M-g in Gnus? I don't think > so. > > (Probably it would even be sufficient _for you_ to change M-g to goto > only in the Emacs related groups.)
I'm not talking about M-g => goto-line, but M-g as a prefix key for various goto-xxx commands. IMO, the FILE:LINE format should not be recognized by the ordinary goto-line command -- it should be a separate command on, e.g. M-g f. Mnemonic: M-g f => goto file at point In the future, there may be many useful "goto" commands with the M-g prefix. Gnus shouldn't assume that none of those bindings will be useful in a gnus-related window. For example, if M-g m did something like "goto *Messages* buffer", and M-g c was "goto *compilation* buffer", gnus shouldn't hide those bindings. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
