Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> When loading a byte-compiled file that used define-generic-mode, I >>> think you'll get an error that generic-mode-list is not defined >>> (because generic.el doesn't get loaded: the autoload caused >>> generic.el to be loaded during byte-compilation, but it doesn't >>> have any such effect when loading the macro-expanded code). > >> Good point. The same goes for calling generic-mode-internal. I'll >> add autoload cookies to generic-mode-list and generic-mode-internal. > > Maybe a better choice is to put a (require 'generic) in the macro > expanded code.
I thought about that. The difference is that adding (require 'generic) causes generic.el to be loaded the moment a file with a compiled define-generic-mode call gets loaded. Using autoload cookies delays loading generic.el until the generic-mode function is actually called. I prefer the latter. Maybe the mode function will never be called. For example, it makes it possible to remove (require 'generic) from generic-x.el. So you can just load generic-x.elc to define a bunch of major modes (and add them to auto-mode-alist) and generic.el will only be loaded when you actually use one of them. Why do you prefer adding (require 'generic)? Lute. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel