Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> M-g n - next-error (goto-next-locus) >>> M-g M-n - next-error (goto-next-locus) >>> M-g p - previous-error >>> M-g M-p - previous-error > >> Most definitely YES! > > I would also like to see `first-error' there while we're at it. So how > about: > > M-g < - first-error
While this is somewhat mnemonic, I don't see that it is necessary given that C-u M-g n already exists. > (Maybe as `M-g 1' too?) Disagree. Does not fit our usual patterns. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
