"Jan D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>If Jan has an automated script, that's great. In the meantime I did >>>two new xpm's, a little bit brighter and two sizes bigger than the >>>first one. There are screenshots for them as well. >>> >>>diropen2.xpm - A bit too big, height 24px. >>> >>> >> >>Actually, I find that ok. >> >> >> >>>diropen3.xpm - Feels better, height 20px. >>> >>> >> >>The color appears to be off somewhat, inconsistent with other colors. >>I suggest we wait for Jan to speak up: presumably if he does the >>conversion with his method, what was consistent in GNOME, should >>become consistent in Emacs. >> >> > > The Gnome icons are consistent because the Gnome people designed them > that way,
That's what I said. > I didn't do anything in the conversion. Ah, but the question is, just _how_ did you convert them? So that one can convert this item in the same way. > The colors of this icon seem to be a bit off compared to the > standard icons. I don't have any opinion on this icon, if you feel > it is better, check it in. Personally, I definitely find it better than the "d" folder thing. Even though that is not a hard task. > Just don't forget to reduce the colors some more, ideally not more > than hundred. Otherwise people running on 8 bit displays will run > out. When reducing colors, avoid dithering, it looks bad on icons > this small. And use the same palette as for the other icons also, > so the sum of colors Emacs uses doesn't increase (it is on the limit > for 8 bit displays already). Did you do the conversion manually, or did you use some special tool for it? Actually, this is a stupid question since you probably did not use pencil and paper. So what tool did you use, and how? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
