> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:00:42 -0600 (CST) > From: Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > However, last time when I proposed something similar (for url.texi, if > I remember well), you and Karl and Dave opposed me on this and I wound > up using a regular @xref. Did you change your mind on this or is > there a fundamental difference between emacs-xtra and url.texi?
Well, I didn't suggest @inforef as the first choice this time either, did I? I still think @ifinfo is a better choice. One fundamental difference between emacs-xtra and url is that the former holds material that was deliberately excluded from the Emacs manual. OTOH, url is the documentation of a package. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
