On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:52:47 -0500, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was thinking that C-x 8 is obsolete, but if this is the best way to > do that, maybe it means C-x 8 is not obsolete. What do people think?
Why would C-x 8 be obsolete? What has replaced it? The various latin-x input methods are certainly not good replacements, as they're quite a bit more heavyweight and intrusive (my standard input method is set to Japanese, and I often use C-x 8 to enter the odd accented letter or symbol into english text). -miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
