"Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:18:49 +0200 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> it has already been decided that Emacs will not get a >> generic interface to call binary modules, in order not to make it >> legally feasible to employ it as a tightly coupled component in >> basically unfree systems. > > Richard will have the definitive answer, but I don't think this > applies to standard components of the OS.
Not all ActiveX controls are standard components of the OS unless I am mistaken (which, given that I don't know Windows at all, might very well be the case). "ActiveX" is, I think, just an interface, like DLLs or dynamic libraries are. What component will actually be accessed through that interface is a different question. One of the most prevalent use for ActiveX controls these days seem to be virus and Trojan horses, and they, though quite in open distribution, don't usually meet either the free software or the operating system component description. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
