David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Since calc is distributed with Emacs 22.x, I don't see a reason >> to have a separate report-calc-bug function anymore. > > The bug reporting commands also report the settings of variables. If > the general Emacs bug reporting command were to include the values of > all existing subsystems, we would get wagonloads of useless > information.
It may not always be useless... Actually, it would be sometimes be useful if bug reports contained the value of all variables with a non-default value. > Also, subsystems often have their own bug reporting > lists and maintainers. True, but if a package is included with emacs, those maintainers should follow the emacs bug list anyway. > However, we should probably encourage some conventions. I have here: > > TeX-submit-bug-report > c-submit-bug-report > eshell-report-bug > gnus-bug > preview-report-bug > report-emacs-bug This just emphasizes my pov -- how does a user know which of those to use -- or that they exist at all? -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
