Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Just skimming through it, I notice "namespace". Is it really a
> builtin? I would've expected it to be a keyword.
It's a command, if that's what you're asking. (I got this list from
Some-Frighteningly-Thick-Tcl-Book.)
>> + (list (concat "\\(\\s-\\|^\\|\\[\\)"
>> + (regexp-opt tcl-builtin-list t)
>> + "\\(\\s-\\|$\\|\\]\\)")
>
> How 'bout (concat "\\_<" (regexp-opt tcl-builtin-list t) "\\_>") ?
OK. I used the format I did because it's the same as the existing
stuff in tcl.el.
>> + '("\\\\$" 0 font-lock-warning-face) ; escaped EOL
>
> Why warning? Is it dangerous? I don't think so.
Personally, I like it to stand out (that's no argument, of course!).
I think I was trying to be consistent with sh-script.el.
There, escaped EOLs used to be highlighted in string-face. But that
confused sh-get-indent-info, so I changed it to warning-face.
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2003-09/msg00028.html>
> Also the regexp matched more than escaped EOL, it also matches an
> escaped backslash at the end of the line.
The regexp is also the same as the sh-script.el one.
What's a regexp for "/ at the end of a line, not preceded by an odd
number of other /"?
I tried this monstrosity:
"\\(?:[^\\\\]\\|\\(?:\\\\\\\\\\)+\\)\\(\\\\\\)$"
but it also matches \\\\ (I don't see why).
I can just leave this part out, I'm not especially bothered.
But sh-script should at least be corrected, I guess.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
