Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Apr 5, 2005 4:31 PM, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just because we cannot find a long name for it -- that's silly, IMO! >> Please keep the option. It serves the purpose it was added for very >> well!! > > There seems no reason not to split it into a couple of more coherent > options though.
So instead of "emacs -Q" I have to ask a user to please try "emacs -q -A -T --no-bla-bla -V --no-blinking-cursor" As I said: Please keep the option. It serves the purpose it was added for very well!! -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
