[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs. >> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal >> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you >> would normally like to have for daily work. > > Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too.
Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name should contain the word debug. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
