> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:07 -0700
> 
> I checked and I could not see any difference in behavior compared to the
> approach in my first patch.
> 
> Is this OK? 

Fine with me, but please respond to David's concerns.

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Reply via email to