Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Isn't it better to just do away with DONTCOMPILE and just rely on lisp >> files setting no-byte-compile? >> >> I think so. It would be simpler to use just one mechanism, >> and no-byte-compile is cleaner. Could you please do that, >> and put no-byte-compile into any files which could use it and >> don't have it? > > I'll do that.
Done. I've changed lisp/Makefile.in and lisp/makefile.w32-in. They don't use DONTCOMPILE anymore. I've also changed make-dist because it looked for DONTCOMPILE in lisp/Makefile.in. Lute. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
