David Ponce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Isn't inserting a ^L at the proper place the canonical solution?
> Yes you're right. Following is a new patch. with headers: > Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) > by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) > (Exim 4.34) id 1DP9E7-0006L8-Is > for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:14:31 -0400 > Received: from [193.252.22.24] (helo=smtp7.wanadoo.fr) > by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DOfBk-000611-89 > for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:10:04 -0400 Well, small wonder I did not get to see the patch. While everybody else was in on the joke by being in the "Cc:" list, the poor mortals served by emacs-devel only were foiled by mx20 refusing to talk to monty-python for more than a day... Is this something one should tell anybody, and if so who? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
